Monday, May 17, 2010

Interview with "Alice" Producers Jennifer and Suzanne Todd

DisneyDreaming.com has a thorough interview with two of the producers of Alice in Wonderland: Jennifer Todd and Suzanne Todd. The sisters answered fans' questions, and explain what their roles as producers entailed, what it was like for a producer to be on set and work with actors like Mia Wasikowska and Johnny Depp, the upcoming DVD and Blu-ray release of Alice, what it's like being a female producer in a mostly male-dominated industry, and much more. (The interview is in two parts at DisneyDreaming.com: Part One and Part Two):




Q: Suzanne, Are you planning to bring another other classical novel to the cinema in the near future?

A: Suzanne Todd – We do have a number of projects currently in development that are based on literary works – we are big fans of classic literature and have always been avid readers.

Q: Suzanne, Can you tell us about how you entered the project with Tim Burton?

A: Suzanne Todd – We had developed the project with the writer, Linda Woolverton, and had sent it to Tim to consider after the script had been written. Tim was a first choice, a dream choice, and we were thrilled when he decided to sign on for the project.

Q: Suzanne, I would like to know if the character that emerges from the film, that is an Alice/Jeanne d’Arc was the intention of the director or developed along the way…?

A: Suzanne Todd – Many people responded to the Joan of Arc style costume and liked the comparison.

Q: Jennifer, I would like to know if the character that emerges from the film, that is an Alice/Jeanne d’Arc was in the intentions of the director or developed along the way…

A: Jennifer Todd – Only in homage to her armor, not from a character point of view.

Q: Jennifer, Having both Tim Burton and Johnny Depp (along with other talented cast and crew members) involved in the film, you literally struck gold. How was the experience working for both of you working with Burton and Depp?

A: Jennifer Todd – It was amazing – they are both ridiculously talented and watching their creativity – and their friendship- was very special.

Q: Jennifer, what would you say was the biggest challenge in producing this movie?

A: Jennifer Todd – The special effects were incredibly difficult. Combining Motion Capture, CG characters, animation, and 3D made this the most challenging film we’ve done.

Q: Suzanne, How did you manage the green screen-scenes? Did you give the actors something by the hand that they can act to something?

A: Suzanne Todd – Yes! We had green everything! Green props, tables, walls, teacups, platforms – so much green everywhere all over everything!

Q: Jennifer. .. Please talk about the decision to make the film in 3D and also your thoughts on the post-production conversion process versus shooting in 3D, from both a budgetary standpoint and an end-user standpoint.

A: Jennifer Todd – We chose not to shoot in 3D because of the difficulty of all the special effects we were doing. It was also more cost-effective for us to convert later.

Q: Suzanne, By any chance, did the both of you have to immerse yourself in the Lewis Carroll classic prior to working on the film?

A: Suzanne Todd – Yes, we all re-read the novels and we also reviewed all the many ways that works of Carroll have been seen in other movies, art, music videos and all forms of pop culture.

Q: Jennifer, How was the experience of working with Tim Burton and Johnny Depp?

A: Jennifer Todd – It was incredible. Their friendship is so unique and special and I think really adds so much to the creative process.

Q: Suzanne, How was it to work with Tim Burton? Did you ever have to force one point that differed from Burton’s vision?


A: Suzanne Todd – Working with Tim was literally a dream come true! He is truly a visionary, artist and genius! Plus, a really nice and funny guy.

Q: Jennifer, Team Todd has produced a good number of box office hits. But with “Alice in Wonderland”, it’s your first film that utilized special effects in such a grand scale, what was the most challenging part for each of you in producing the film?

A: Jennifer Todd – Definitely the special effects. We have worked with effects before but never at a scale like this. The combination of CG, animation, and motion capture – along with Alice’s character shrinking and growing made the filming very difficult and intense.

Q: Jennifer, How do you manage to work with relatives, sisters, in particular? Is it fun? Is it hard to separate family and the job?

A: Jennifer Todd – It’s a real gift to work with my sister. We obviously have such a shorthand communicating with each other, that it makes the process easier. And from growing up together and watching so many films together, we ended up with pretty similar taste.

Q: Suzanne… Please talk about the decision to make the film in 3D and also your thoughts on the post-production conversion process versus shooting in 3D, from both a budgetary standpoint and an end-user standpoint.

A: Suzanne Todd – Tim had the genius idea to make the movie in 3D and it’s been interesting to see how 3D has become so incredibly popular in the years it took us to make this movie. We did not have the time or money to actually shoot in 3D, but our film was planned for 3D release so there were lots of things built in along the way to make that movie going experience satisfying. From an end user standpoint, I think the planned shots in 3D movies like Avatar and ours will continue to be better received than 2D films that make a last minute decision to convert.

Q: Jennifer, Everybody knows what Burton can add to Alice’s history. But, what did Alice add to Burton’s filmography that we didn’t find before?

A: Jennifer Todd – I think Alice added a real female empowerment film to his filmography. I can’t think of another film he’s done with this great of a female hero, and with the theme of the film so strong. And Alice gave him his biggest hit ever!

Q: Suzanne, Why did Tim Burton adapt both Alice-stories, ‘Alice in Wonderland’ and ‘Through the Looking-Glass’?

A: Suzanne Todd – The writer, Linda Woolverton, had decided to use material from both books when she first came up with the pitch. The Carroll novels did not put forth a simple movie adaption and she found material in both books that would be helpful in crafting a linear three-act structure for the movie.

Q: Jennifer, At which point of the creation-process did you make the decision that the whole movie is going to be cgi-driven such as it is right now?


A: Jennifer Todd – Very early on. I believe it was in our first meeting with Tim, he talked about creating a world from scratch using today’s technology.

Q: Suzanne, What do you think Lewis Carroll would think if he saw the movie?

A: Suzanne Todd – I hope he would be entertained! He seems to have been an out-of-the-box thinker and this version pushes the Alice mythology to a new level of both technology and storytelling. In my fantasy mind, he would leap from his chair and Futterwacken!

Q: Jennifer, What do you think Lewis Carroll would think if he saw the movie?

A: Jennifer Todd – I would hope he would appreciate our interpretation of his work – and I would think the effects would be amazing for him to see! There has been so much art inspired by his work I think he would be touched by the world’s affection for his stories.

Q: Jennifer, What do you think this version of Alice in Wonderland bring new as compared to other productions?

A: Jennifer Todd – Obviously this version takes advantage of the most cutting edge technology that none of the other versions were privy to. Tim was able to create a world like none other. We also took creative license with the characters, making Alice older, and incorporating elements from both books.

Q: Suzanne – Do you see any reflection in your own sister-sister relationship and the one between the White and Red Queens?

A: Suzanne Todd – Absolutely! Anyone that has a sister knows the agony and ecstasy of that relationship. Anne had really looked to get in touch with the family roots of her character – and the darkness and light that both sisters share – as a means of portraying her character with depth and realism.

Q: Jennifer, same question, Do you see any reflection in your own sister-sister relationship and the one between the White and Red Queens?

A: Jennifer Todd – Jokingly yes. But thankfully no, I didn’t other than that I understand how beautiful and complicated the relationship of sisters can be.

Q: Suzanne, What is your favourite character in the movie? which was more fun to draw out?

A: Suzanne Todd – I love so many of the characters! I feel like a mother in the way you have love for all your children. But if I have to pick one, it would be Alice – for her strength and curiosity and bravery and compassion. The idea that a movie with a female teenage lead character could be this successful at the world wide box office is a testament to Alice and her muchness.

Q: Jennifer, Why write a different story of Alice?

A: Jennifer Todd – We wrote a different story to modernize it and to make it more universal. What’s wonderful about the book is that it magically wanders, and that’s what makes it hard as a film. It was also necessary to make her older, so she would have graver complications in her life.

Q: Jennifer, How do you choose your movie projects, do you prefer a movie because of the script, the actors, or the director?

A: Jennifer Todd – We get involved so early that it is usually the idea and the material that gets us excited. On Alice, Linda brought us a pitch that we thought was a very exciting way in which to tell the story. Then after we all worked on the script it was incredibly exciting to get Tim and Johnny involved.

Q: Suzanne, What is the international expectation that you have for this DVD and Blu Ray launch?

A: Suzanne Todd – We expect that the public will continue to respond to the film in the way we have seen thus far – with enthusiastic response! Anyone that has seen and enjoyed the film will be further entranced at a look behind the scenes into the magic of Tim Burton’s Alice and the quality
on Blu-ray. The shorter home entertainment release window should also ensure a healthy public appetite – we will see!

Q: Jennifer, In the past you produced ‘Austin Powers’, ‘Across The Universe’ and now ‘Alice In Wonderland’. Did you yourself push the colorful look of these films?

A: Jennifer Todd – Not really, the directors are most responsible for the color of the films. I will say we are drawn to creating material that allows directors to create worlds, or push the palate of reality.

Q: Jennifer, what is it like to work with your sister?

A: Jennifer Todd – It’s great. We have been so lucky and I think it’s partly because we truly support each other. It’s very hard to get movies made, so it’s nice knowing we are each here for the other.

Q: Suzanne, If we look to use High Definition, does it mean the production has to be changed as every detail is now visible?


A: Suzanne Todd – Yes, as the technology advances there is more attention paid during the filmmaking process and the high-level of detail that becomes available to the viewing audience. Even something like the texture of the white pancaked skin of the Red Queen becomes subject for discussion, because you can see everything in so much greater detail now.

Q: Jennifer, What is your favourite character in the movie? which was more fun to draw out?

A: Jennifer Todd – I really love the Red Queen – I love the reason she’s so mean is that she’s just a scorned woman. She says “is it better to be feared than loved” and even though she is so awful you understand that it’s because she feels unloved.

Q: Suzanne, What other projects do you have coming up?

A: Suzanne Todd – Our next release is a very small film entitled, “The Romantics” starring Katie Holmes, Josh Duhamel, and Anna Pacquin. It will come out in Fall of 2010 and is the charming story of a group of close friends, ten years after their college graduation.

Q: Suzanne, What kinds of discussions have you had about a sequel at this time, seeing how successful this film was?

A: Suzanne Todd – When a movie is this successful, there is always talk of a sequel! If Tim and Johnny both want to venture down the rabbit hole again – I’m sure it will happen. We have had some preliminary story conversations – but I’m not sure anyone realizes just how hard Tim worked on this film.

Q: Suzanne, How long did the process of the postproduction last?

A: Suzanne Todd – We finished shooting the movie at the end of 2008, with our scheduled release date of March 2010 but it was a scramble to get it done in that time frame. That was a long post for a regular film but a tight post for a film with this many complicated effects.

Q: Suzanne, You knew John Foreman, what did you learned from this great producer?

A: Suzanne Todd – I learned a lot about what a producer does from John Foreman and that “the idea” is key when taking on a movie project. He was someone that loved the process and loved watching movies as much as making them.

Q: Jennifer, “Alice” is a much bigger feature than all the other both of you have been into. What changed in the way you work to accomplish this one?

A: Jennifer Todd – Alice took over two years to make and took a great deal of planning, obviously much more than usual. We spent so much more time prepping the film, and that was unique for us.

Q: Suzanne, Where there any accidents because the actors had to walk on stilts?

A: Suzanne Todd – The actors actually became very proficient on the stilts – almost to the point where they hardly noticed they were wearing them. I became very used to thinking of Crispin as really, really tall.

Q: Suzanne, Are you fans of the original Lewis Carroll books? Have you read them to your children?

A: Suzanne Todd – Recently I had the pleasure of going through the very fun Alice for the iPad short version of the book. It’s interactive and imaginative and entertaining and made me think how different the entire experience of even reading is for children today.

Q: Jennifer, How would you say this movie has influenced you two, as producers and sisters?


A: Jennifer Todd – I think we are both so proud that we got to make a “female empowerment” movie on a scale like this. The movie has so many wonderful themes but Alice’s strength is so wonderful to put out in the world to young girls.

Q: Suzanne, What do you think of Johnny Depp as Mad Hatter? Could you imagine him in another role?

A: Suzanne Todd – Johnny was incredible and brought so much to the role, long before he began the acting part. The watercolors he painted of the characters, his ideas about the mercury poisoning from the hat glue – and so much more! Johnny is one of the most talented actors of our time and could play any role he wanted! There was an internet rumor that he was going to play EVERY part and I thought I would like to see that version of the movie!

Q: Jennifer, Is there anything in Alice in Wonderland that you can point us to and say “That is a Team Todd contribution?”

A: Jennifer Todd – Absolutely, Suzanne and I worked very hard with Linda on Alice’s character arc and working on her “muchness”. We also were proud to have developed a script strong enough to appeal to Tim Burton and all the talent attracted to the project.

Q: Jennifer, What do you think of Johnny Depp as Mad Hatter? Could you imagine him in another role?

A: Jennifer Todd – I think Johnny Depp could play just about any role – I’d love to see what he would do with the Red Queen!

Q: Jennifer, What do you think about the current hype of 3D?

A: Jennifer Todd – I think it’s great for the film business and I’m very grateful that it helped our box office tremendously.



Q: Suzanne, As children, did you wonder in awe even at the ’simpler,’ animated version of Disney’s ‘Alice In Wonderland’?

A: Suzanne Todd – We had seen the animated version as children and I remember being both in awe of the creativity and sort of confused about the story. I loved the character of Alice and had actually dressed up as Alice for more than one Halloween.

Q: Suzanne, How involved are producers in the development of DVD /Blu-Ray features?

A: Suzanne Todd – Producers are very involved in the creation of additional bonus materials, putting together the featurettes that you see, and adding insight to the behind-the-scenes process.

Q: Suzanne, How often do you come across a script that you love but as producers – you know won’t work in the mass market? And are you free to make it thru the indie route?

A: Suzanne Todd – There have been a few occasions when we found material we truly loved that could not be financed and released through the traditional studio model. Memento was the first indie movie we had made, and even though we had to work for free, we were very happy with the result!

Q: Suzanne, This interpretation of Alice has a definite darker, adult twist – was this the vision from the outset or did that evolve? How much did Tim Burton’s unique style and interpretation affect this?

A: Suzanne Todd – Linda’s script had some already “dark” elements – the notion of the oversized body parts and the floating severed heads, for instance, but it naturally followed the course of Tim’s taste and sensibility after he came on board.

Q: Jennifer, As women in a male-dominated industry, what are qualities needed to survive Hollywood?

A: Jennifer Todd – Good question! I think you have to have a tough will and a very strong spirit. Movies are so hard to get made. I do think women make great producers though; we are good multi-taskers and caretakers.

Q: Jennifer, What did you learn working alongside, director, Tim Burton, for Alice in Wonderland?

A: Jennifer Todd – I learned from Tim that you can never aim too high. He really reached on this film from his own comfort zone and the results were magical. I learned you can never stop pushing the envelope.

Q: Suzanne, What attracted you to Alice in Wonderland? Especially since it had been done many times before.


A: Suzanne Todd – Yes, it’s true that Alice had been done many times before, but we felt that Linda’s take on the story took a fresh look at the time honored tale, and that the coupling of modern technology with Tim’s genius vision would make for fascinating entertainment.

Q: Suzanne, Can you tell us what it is like to work with Johnny Depp?


A: Suzanne Todd – There just aren’t the proper adjectives to describe the magnificence of Johnny Depp. He is the most incredibly talented actor yet also kind, down to earth, and hard-working.

Q: Jennifer, Can you tell us what it is like to work with Johnny Depp?

A: Jennifer Todd – Johnny’s such a sweet, likeable guy and a tremendous talent. He’s so affable; he makes you forget what a giant movie star he is.

Q: Suzanne, Where does your creative inspiration come from?

A: Suzanne Todd – My creative inspiration comes from so many aspects of my life – art, music, literature, pop culture, my children, my friends, and lots of travel and adventure!

Q: Jennifer, As I understand it, Alice is the first time Tim Burton has filmed on a green screen. With so much of the film shot against green screen, combined with demanding VFX, how much pre-production time was involved and what were some of the challenges foreseen?

A: Jennifer Todd – We prepped the film for about 6 months; it was a long prep to get everything organized for the shoot. Even then we still came across a lot of difficulties on set, with Alice shrinking and growing and taking into account the Queen’s head and all the fake characters, it felt like a complicated math puzzle every day.

Q: Jennifer, As children, did you wonder in awe even at the ’simpler,’ animated version of Disney’s ‘Alice In Wonderland’?

A: Jennifer Todd – Absolutely – I loved the original and I always loved the Disney ride! It’s amazing how far filmmaking has come since I was a child.

Q: Jennifer, Where does your creative inspiration come from?

A: Jennifer Todd – It comes from all over – films and books I’ve loved as well as the artists in my life. Now it also comes from my children.

Q: Jennifer, What were the biggest problems as a producer with getting the final product?

A: Jennifer Todd – One of the biggest problems was getting the film done in time. We had our release date locked very early, and we could not change it. So the last few months were very stressful waiting for the final FX to come in.

Q: Suzanne, What were the biggest problems as a producer with getting the final product?

A: Suzanne Todd – Like almost all movies, and certainly big tent pole movies, it always comes down to time and money. Luckily for us, with Tim directing, we never lacked for creative vision, so the task for everyone involved was to work their hardest to bring Tim’s vision to the screen – within the schedule and resources that we had available.

Q: Jennifer, What do you feel 3-D did for Alice in Wonderland in a new generation?

A: Jennifer Todd – I’m happy that 3D has excited a great deal of people to go to the movie theater. And I think that being one of the first big 3D films out in the US after Avatar helped our film tremendously.

Q: Jennifer, Were you surprised with the overwhelming success of ‘Alice’ at the box office?

A: Jennifer Todd – I was – although I expected the film would do well as I knew how good it was. But no one can predict the kind of numbers the film did. I wish I could!

Q: Suzanne, At what point in the process did Mia Wasikowska become involved? Was she always first choice for the role, did she audition etc.

A: Suzanne Todd – Tim had a very specific vision for the role of Alice and met with and read with a number of actresses. Although there were many famous actresses who wanted to play Alice, Tim wanted someone that would bring a timeless quality to the film. Mia demonstrated the perfect blend of strength and fragility, bewilderment and wonder, and is beautiful yet accessible.

Q: Jennifer, Did you find it more or less difficult to oversee production on a film with Burton’s whimsical touches? On a film that was mostly digitally created?

A: Jennifer Todd – I actually felt it was easier as Tim still had the freedom to make changes after we filmed the movie. That’s one of the upsides of a mostly digital film. He could make changes you could never make in a traditional live-action film.

Q: Jennifer, You’ve spent a significant time working in independent film – a far cry from Disney and blockbusters like Alice in Wonderland. Can you tell us what the transition was like for you, and whether or not your indie sensibilities informed the production of Alice at all?

A: Jennifer Todd – They are such different film making experiences, but yet I like them both. Obviously you always want to tell a great story, no matter how big or small. I love the intimacy of small films and I love the reach of big films like ALICE.

Q: Jennifer, Alice has such a long history on the big and small screen, was it daunting to create this new version?

A: Jennifer Todd – It was – it’s a bit scary to take on such a famous piece of literature. But at the same time we re-imagined it in a way that we thought would feel fresh to an audience.

Q: Suzanne, Were you surprised with the overwhelming success of ‘Alice’ at the box office?

A: Suzanne Todd – We could tell that there was a pretty voracious appetite for the film from the time the online campaign had launched. The facebook fan page was burning up and people were hungry for anything and everything about the film. Although we did have a sense that it would be well-received, no one dared to dream that we would approach a billion dollars worldwide!

Q: Jennifer, If you could go back to the beginning now, is there anything you’d want to do differently?

A: Jennifer Todd – I can’t say there is. Because of the success of the film, I’m just thrilled with it all.

Q: Suzanne, If you could go back to the beginning now, is there anything you’d want to do differently?

A: Suzanne Todd – There isn’t really much I would change about the production – I’m beyond thrilled with how everything turned out! I guess I would add time in the schedule if that was possible so Tim wouldn’t have had to work literally round the clock to finish the movie on time.

Q: Jennifer, What turned out to be favorite scene in the film, and is it surprising?

A: Jennifer Todd – Hmmm…that’s so hard. I love the introduction to the Red Queen when she’s playing croquet, I also love the end with Alice and the Mad Hatter.

Q: Suzanne, What turned out to be favorite scene in the film, and is it surprising?

A: Suzanne Todd – I have too many favorites!!! I love the resolution to the wedding proposal, the goodbye scene with the Hatter, and I am always surprised by how affected I am when she says “Lost my muchness, have I?”

Q: Suzanne, Did you read Alice in Wonderland as a child? Did the storyline have the same affect on you now, as an adult?

A: Suzanne Todd – I did read it as a children and when I re-read it as an adult, it seemed very different than what I had remembered! The movie story is obviously inspired by the Carroll novels but Linda created a structure for the movie that did not exist in the books.

Q: Jennifer, Can you discuss the way in which Tim Burton works on a set, compared to say Chris Nolan or Julie Taymor?

A: Jennifer Todd – Every director is so different, but these three are clearly so talented. Chris is a writer/director so I think he’s very confident in his material when he directs. All three of them are perfectionists – which I think one must be to deliver films on the level they do.

Q: Suzanne, Can you discuss the way in which Tim Burton works on a set, compared to say Chris Nolan or Julie Taymor?


A: Suzanne Todd – All three of those directors share a high-level of vision and commitment and we have been fortunate to work with such amazing talent. Tim is unique in many ways – one of which is that his process is SO visual – he starts by drawing and painting and sketching and moves forward in the process from there.

Q: Suzanne, The movie looks amazing, what was it like to be able to bring this classic story to a whole new audience?

A: Suzanne Todd – It has been very exciting to re-interpret a classic story! From the moment Tim signed on, I have felt a bit like I’ve needed to pinch myself to wake up from my own dream, just like our young Alice in the film.

Q: Jennifer, How did you map out the different sides of The Mad Hatter’s personality both in visuals and voice?

A: Jennifer Todd – Well the decision to make his eyes big was Tim’s and is just an amazing effect. Johnny decided the Hatter was a bit of a split personality – his Scottish accent comes out when he’s angry and remembering his past.

Q: Jennifer, You’ve assembled an amazing cast, many of whom are unrecognizable in their roles, was there anybody who turned you down though?

A: Jennifer Todd – No! That’s one of the great gifts of working with Tim – actors are dying to work with him.

Q: Jennifer, Given the relationship between Tim and Johnny, how difficult or challenging was it to collaborate?

A: Jennifer Todd – Once they decided to work together it was very easy. Their friendship and ease with each other made the filmmaking process really nice. It also set a nice tone on the set for the other actors.

Q: Jennifer, How does the experience compare between working on such a behemoth as Alice and a smaller scale movie like Memento?

A: Jennifer Todd – The time commitment is much greater on a big film. ALICE was about three years in the process and that’s even quick for a movie of its size. Also it takes so many more people to complete a film like this – Memento was such a small, intimate experience, the two feel like very different processes.

Q: Suzanne, The casting of the film was fascinating – not simply because of the little-known Mia Wasikowska. Can you tell us how Crispin Glover became involved?

A: Suzanne Todd – The casting was very unusual because on most films you go through a process of making offers, having actors pass on the project, and then working your way down the list. When you have Tim Burton directing, everyone is dying to work with him so he just picks who he likes and everyone says yes!

Q: Jennifer, We often hear stories of Johnny Deep staying in character throughout a shoot, was he like that for Alice, was he in Hatter mode a lot of the time?

A: Jennifer Todd – He was, although at the end of the day when he was cleaned up and not in make-up anymore he seemed to just be himself.

Q: Suzanne, Did the two of you “produce” anything in your younger days? (Backyard plays are acceptable)

A: Suzanne Todd – Yes! Story telling was always a big deal in our house from a very young age, and I was always an avid reader. We liked to act out scenes from The Phantom Tollbooth, which was one of my all-time favorites from childhood.

Q: Jennifer, Did the two of you “produce” anything in your younger days? (Backyard plays are acceptable)

A: Jennifer Todd – No, but my sister killed me off in a couple of her student films at USC. I was always her main actress, pity for her.

Q: Suzanne, Have you, for one reason or another, passed on any scripts that you later saw turned into great films?

A: Suzanne Todd – No, but the first project I ever did with Linda Woolverton was a great script that I have always still wanted to make – the movie adaptation of the book “Wicked”, which Linda adapted for me in 1996.

Q: Jennifer, Ken Ralston has done an amazing job of VFX. How did Ken get involved in the project – was he a first choice? – and what were some of the challenges cast/crew faced in delivering such convincing performances with so many VFX considerations to work around, such as oversized heads and the varying height of Alice?

A: Jennifer Todd – Ken was the first choice for the film – he’s such an amazing talent and really at the forefront of VFX. The challenges were enormous – every day was like a giant geometry equation of where Alice would stand and be the right size, where the eye lines for the CG characters were, where people could stand and not interfere with the Queen’s head. Thank goodness Ken could figure it all out.

Q: Suzanne, You’ve been involved in the production of notable visual spectacles in the past, particularly Across The Universe, how was this production different to those other effect-heavy films?

A: Suzanne Todd – This was different in that there were SO many effects that there was hardly a scene or a shot to be found that had no effects. Alice also represents every type of effect and some mixed effects that hadn’t been done before: motion capture, cgi, hybrid characters, and the idea that no matter what her size that Alice always remains “normal” looking in any environment.

Q: Jennifer, The visual effects are quite in-depth, is it hard to visualize the end computerized result when working with the actors?

A: Jennifer Todd – Yes – I give the actors great credit for acting to a green screen and making it so convincing. One day on the set Mia was running on a treadmill and an AD was yelling out “tree branch” for every time she was supposed to duck – it looked very difficult to me!

Q: Suzanne, I’ve read that motion capture was originally filmed but later discarded in favor of live action and animation – if this is correct, why this decision was made?

A: Suzanne Todd – It wasn’t so much that anything was discarded, but it was a process of discovery to figure out which technologies could best service each of the very different characters.

Q: Jennifer, What attracted you to Alice in Wonderland? Especially since it had been done many times before.

A: Jennifer Todd – I loved this take on Alice – I had never pictured her as a young woman before, and one who would become a symbol for female empowerment.

Q: Suzanne, why a remake of a classic?

A: Suzanne Todd – I don’t think our film is a “remake” on any other Alice film, I think it’s a reinterpretation of a classic tale. But the Alice mythology is resonant around the world and people have shown great interest in modern re-telling.

Q: Jennifer, There’s an interesting quote in the special features we’re seeing, which says of the Red Queen that she is played like a petulant child pretending at being queen, does that describe the theory at the outset, or did that evolve dynamically during the shooting?


A: Jennifer Todd – I think Helena brought a lot of that to the character. She’s written as a woman who is cruel because she is unloved, but I think Helena brought a great petulant quality.

Q: Jennifer, How much creativity did Johnny Depp bring to The Mad Hatter character?

A: Jennifer Todd – Johnny brought so much to the character. We re-wrote quite a bit of the Hatter when Johnny came in, we fleshed out his back story of his family being killed, which explained his motivation and state of mind. Also all the lovely nuances of the character – his accent, wardrobe, etc were all created by Johnny with Tim.

Q: Suzanne, How did you find the right balance to remake Alice, but not isolate the audience with the tragedy within some characters?

A: Suzanne Todd – The characters in Alice, much like in any great literary work, and filled with both good and evil and struggling to find balance. It is that very struggle that we find fascinating and worth taking on this classic story.

Q: Jennifer, Did you get to keep any of the props from Alice in Wonderland?

A: Jennifer Todd – Sadly no, there weren’t many props to pinch! The Hatter’s tea was so beautiful but it went on tour after we finished filming.

Q: Suzanne, How hard was it to find the right Alice?

A: Suzanne Todd – I wouldn’t say it was difficult but it was a thoughtful and time-consuming process. Tim’s taste is exquisite and he knew exactly what he was looking for and found it plus more in our amazing Mia.

Q: Jennifer, Have you, for one reason or another, passed on any scripts that you later saw turned into great films?

A: Jennifer Todd – I can’t think of any I have – although it’s bound to happen. As a producer you have to accept your own taste and know that you won’t catch everything. I’m sure I would miss a great horror film if it came my way as I’m not good at those.

Q: Jennifer, At what stage of production did you decide to make the film 3D?


A: Jennifer Todd – At the beginning when Tim signed on. He was very keen on making this his first 3D film as the technology had just improved so much.

Q: Suzanne, What drew you to work on a classic such as Alice in The Wonderland?

A: Suzanne Todd – The Alice story is very present in modern day and appears in so many ways in movies, TV, and video games. We loved the idea of updating a classic with all the finest modern technologies.

Q: Jennifer, Both Johnny Depp & Helen Bonham are both strong, creative actors, it must have been fun working with them. Can you tell us what they both bring to the set in creativity?

A: Jennifer Todd – They are both so dedicated and fearless. They also are both so imaginative to create in the real world what worked for Wonderland. Both of them had so much input in their hair and make-up, wardrobe, props, etc..

Q: Jennifer, You worked on ‘Across The Universe’. Do you envisage a career peppered with interesting semi-animated projects and what is it you like most about semi-animated films?

A: Jennifer Todd – I love creating worlds and still being real. If I can find more movies to do this with I’ll be thrilled. They’re hard to find.

Q: Suzanne, With Helena Bonham Carter screaming so much she seems to have lost her voice a lot. Did you need a Scream Double?

A: Suzanne Todd – She did not have a scream double – but she did have to do some dialogue replacement after shooting was completed. She took on each day with total conviction – never tiring out from such an exhaustive role.

Q: Jennifer, Do you think this version that Tim Burton did of Alice enrich the classic? Did it respect all the guidelines of the book of Lewis Carroll?

A: Jennifer Todd – I think it is respectful. We used characters and plot from both books but only to enrich the plot of the film. I think the whim and the magic are in step with Lewis Carroll’s work.

Q: Suzanne, You’ve produced 18 movies in 18 years–what are you currently working on and do you ever take a vacation?

A: Suzanne Todd – We are currently working on a new film entitled “Celeste and Jesse Forever” starring Rashida Jones and Justin Timberlake. For vacations, I like to go to Disney World or on the Disney cruise – I am a huge fan of all things Disney!

Q: Jennifer, What made you go with Tim B. as Director of this?

A: Jennifer Todd – He was our first choice – he has the vision and the tone we thought perfectly suited the material.

Q: Suzanne, What has been the most rewarding experience you’ve learned or taken from making this movie?

A: Suzanne Todd – It was wonderful to take my ten-year old to the Royal Premiere in London! As a working mom, my children are so understanding about my sometimes hectic schedule and it was fantastic to share that amazing evening with my son.

Q: Jennifer, When working with such a talented director like Tim Burton, is the worry factor less or more pressure because of his quirkiness as an artist?

A: Jennifer Todd – I think there’s less pressure as Tim is such a known artist, and has had great success in his films prior to Alice.

Q: Jennifer, Tim Burton’s visions are always lush and I guess you would say extravagant (in all the right ways!). Were there any times when Tim’s vision had to be altered, either from a budget point of view or a creative one (to achieve a more ‘mainstream’ appeal, for example)?

A: Jennifer Todd – Not really. Tim self edits rather beautifully, and I think what’s great is that his unique vision appeals to audiences.

Q: Suzanne, What was the most enjoyable aspect of bringing to life this darker interpretation of a much loved classic?


A: Suzanne Todd – The response to the female empowerment at the core of the film has been very rewarding. We have heard from so many fans that the film has inspired them to think outside the box, and find courage in adversity – and that is immensely rewarding.

Q: Jennifer, Was it daunting to take such a well-loved classic tale and take forward into a new story line?

A: Jennifer Todd – Yes. The book is terrific but doesn’t lend itself well to a movie plot, so we were forced to reinvision it a bit without losing its magic.

Q: Jennifer, The original Alice story drew political parallels and satire wrapped up in a children’s story. What were some of the core messages and themes intended to be conveyed in this modern interpretation? Is it just a story about a girl lost in her own world and inner conflict, or do you see something much deeper?

A: Jennifer Todd – Our film is about a young girl at a crossroads in her life and finding the strength within her. It’s her “muchness”, her spirit, which she must tap into to find her way.

Q: Suzanne, Is there a tug of war between producer and director when it comes to creativity?

A: Suzanne Todd – Not when you are working with Tim Burton! He is a true genius and a visionary director.

Q: Jennifer, Is there a tug of war between producer and director when it comes to creativity?

A: Jennifer Todd – Not on a film like this, that was dependent on Tim’s vision. We really gave him the script and waited to see what he would come up with.

Q: Jennifer, Do you always look to work together as producers on projects, and are there times when the demands and stress of producing impact on your relationship?

A: Jennifer Todd – We do mostly produce together and I think it is actually quite easy having each other. It’s nice to have a real ally in the film making process as it’s so hard.

Q: Suzanne, Do you always look to work together as producers on projects, and are there times when the demands and stress of producing impact on your relationship?


A: Suzanne Todd – In the many movies we have made together, we have never disagreed about an important creative decision. We have had trying times, like all sisters do, but never based on the work – usually based on some unreturned shoes that had been borrowed or something like
that.

Q: Suzanne, Do you futterwack? I’m a poor futterwacker, do you have any tips?

A: Suzanne Todd – Yes! We all love to futterwacken! Who doesn’t? The best tips are to watch the video on you tube – and enter our contest! You could be a champion futterwacker! Check out www.Disney.com/Alicedance

Q: Jennifer, This is going to be a hard movie to top, will your next couple of projects be deliberately small scale?

A: Jennifer Todd – We really make whatever we can when we can but it just so turns out that our next film is quite small, THE ROMANTICS, which premiered at Sundance.

Q: Suzanne, As a producer, does Home video give you a safety net or a catch-all in terms of additional story points?

A: Suzanne Todd – In the case of Alice, we were looking more to the home video as an exciting way to give people a peek behind the curtain of the movie making magic. We were not focused on adding additional story points to the Blu-ray/DVD.

Q: Jennifer, With so many different avenues of entertainment available, is it getting more difficult for producers and filmmakers to green light big budget productions? Is the overwhelming box office success of films like Alice, Avatar, etc. helping build confidence in studios/investors/etc.?

A: Jennifer Todd – It seems right now you are either getting films made at a big level like ALICE or AVATAR or very small like our next film THE ROMANTICS. The middle seems to be very difficult these days.

Q: Suzanne, This ‘Alice’ has been mentioned as a sequel to the younger ‘Alice’ yet it comes over as a darker version even to the point of having Mia dressed in armor in her fight against the Red Queen. Was that your original intention to paint the older ‘Alice’ in this way?

A: Suzanne Todd – Yes, in some ways. Our intention was to present an updated Alice that drew from the bones of what Alice was like in the original stories. We take her empowerment to the extreme, like in the instance of wearing armor to attempt to slay the Jabberwocky.

Q: Jennifer, Is it harder to reinvent classic tales than new scripts?

A: Jennifer Todd – Yes and no. It’s great to start with characters that are already known and loved but daunting that you don’t mess it up and upset your audience. Studios like classic tales as it gives them a pre-awareness for an audience.

Q: Jennifer, Any final thoughts on Alice In Wonderland?

A: Jennifer Todd – Thank you all so much for your interest and time today. We are thrilled with the success of the film and hope you all enjoyed it.

Q: Suzanne, Any final thoughts on Alice In Wonderland?


A: Suzanne Todd – Alice has been a true joy to work on! We are thrilled at the response and feel very grateful to be able to make movies like this one!

Sunday, May 16, 2010

"Mars Attacks!" Blu-Ray this September


The Blu-ray version of Tim Burton's Mars Attacks! is expected to hit shelves on September 7th, 2010, says DVDTown.com.

Tim Burton's 1996 science-fiction spoof was based on the macabre Topps trading cards of the same name. The film stars Burton regulars Jack Nicholson, Danny DeVito, Sylvia Sidney, Lisa Marie, and Sarah Jessica Parker, and also stars Natalie Portman, Pierce Brosnan, Annette Benning, Glenn Close, Martin Short, Jack Black, Tom Jones, and many more.

The Blu-ray will carry an SRP of $37.77. Runtime is 107 minutes, and the film will be presented in its original 16x9 letterbox aspect ratio.

No word on what special features will be yet, and it should be noted that the release date is subject to change.

Thursday, May 13, 2010

Video: Christopher Lee Reads "Jabberwocky"


Sir Christopher Lee reads Lewis Carroll's poem Jabberwocky in this video. Lee provided the voice for the fanciful creature in Alice in Wonderland. Click here to view the video, or here to see it on Facebook!

Video: Burton at Cannes, and Press Conference

The official website of the Cannes Film Festival has even more Tim Burton-related material.

There are three videos with Tim Burton of varying length (and in English and French):

Jury Photocall


Jury Interview

Jury Press Conference


Here are a few chosen extracts from the press conference, led by this year's Jury President, Tim Burton:


Have you given the members of the jury any instructions?


Tim Burton: I would never do that. The whole point of being movie industry professionals is not to have preconceptions. I think we're going into the Festival with a certain kind of spirit of openness and hopefully compassion for any filmmaker. We are expecting to be surprised on this trip. What counts is to feel the films, to talk about them, to see how they touch us intellectually or emotionally. I am very eager to get started on this Festival. We are a group of people from different cultures and countries, and that’s what is so fascinating about it. Hopefully we’ll be able just to appreciate the films, and not behave like a bunch of bad-tempered, frustrated artists.

Is it more difficult to judge or be judged?

Tim Burton: We are going to be receptive to what we see, each of us with our own feelings. I don't know if we can be called judges. Being judged or being a judge, neither is easy. We’re always being judged. We will also be judged as members of the Jury. Actually, that may be the most difficult thing. We will try to do our best.

Benicio del Toro, how did you react when you were asked to be a member of the Jury?

Benicio del Toro: I got a call from Thierry Frémaux who asked me if I would be interested in being in the Jury. He told me who the President was: Tim Burton. I thought he was a good choice. Then they sent me a list of people who were being considered as members. There was a film maker I have been watching for some time: Victor Erice. I could not believe that he was on the list, and that’s what really persuaded me to accept the invitation. I have been a fan of his for years. Whenever I am in Spain, I drop his name everywhere, hoping that he’ll call me up, and here he is!

There are no female directors in the competition for the Palme d’Or. What do you think about that?

Tim Burton: I don't know how the selection was made. In my case, all through my career, at least half the people who have green-lighted my projects have been women. When you make a movie, whether you’re a man or a woman, and no matter what country you’re from, there is a kind of fellowship.

Shekhar Kapur: In fact, we are both man and woman at the same time, in ourselves. If you don’t have both, you cannot be an artist.

Victor Erice, how do you feel about being here in Cannes this year when there are a lot of independent auteur movies?

Victor Erice: The selection for the Cannes Festival has always been very balanced. The way I see it, any selection of films is like a two-sided mirror. One side represents our own time, and the other what the cinema of tomorrow might become. It is this contrast that makes any selection of any kind interesting.

There are two women and seven men in the jury? Are you going to give the women three votes each to compensate? And you, Kate Beckinsale and Giovanna Mezzogiorno, how are you going to survive up against so many men?

Kate Beckinsale: I’m used to it. There are always more men than women. I am a great fan of Giovanna’s. I am very happy to be here with her on the jury and I’m not scared of the men. It doesn’t bother me. I am happy to be in such good company.

Giovanna Mezzogiorno: I feel the same way. In general, this question of gender doesn’t interest me, counting how many men or women there are. When I hear this sort of question, I find it hard to understand. I say to myself, “Ah yes, it’s true”. And of course it is true, but it’s not important. What counts is that we don’t know each other. I don’t know anybody. This is what will be most interesting: discovering each other, getting to know each other. It’s about human beings, not gender.

Kate Beckinsale: I don’t think they’ll cramp our style...

"Alice" Nominated for 3 MTV Movie Awards


The nominees for the 2010 MTV Movie Awards have been announced. Alice in Wonderland and its cast are up for three categories: Best Villain (Helena Bonham Carter as the Red Queen), Global Superstar (Johnny Depp), and Best Movie. Click here to vote today! Winners will be announced in the live telecast on Sunday, June 6th, at 9pm eastern and pacific time, 8pm central time.

Wednesday, May 12, 2010

Interview with Cannes Jury Pres Burton


© AFP

The official Cannes Film Festival website has an exclusive interview with Tim Burton, who will preside as the Jury President this year. The interview asks the filmmaker about movies he took dates to, which filmmaker he would most like to be for a few hours, which actors he wish he could've directed, and much more:

An interview before he disappears for 12 days into the darkened theatres of the Palais…


What is your first film memory?

It was Jason and the Argonauts.

What made you want to make films?
Watching monster movies… In Jason and the Argonauts, watching Ray Harryhausen’s creations made me want to become both an animator and/or a filmmaker.

Is there a film you never get tired of watching?

There are several. Ones you watch anytime you want. It’s strange, there’s a weird one like Where Eagles Dare; it’s a movie that everytime it’s on TV, I watch it, because there’s a mood to it, in the snow, and you have the soundtrack and the quietness… Same thing with The Omega Man. There are certain films I would watch anytime, even if I had seen them the day before.

Which scene from a film gives you the greatest sense of emotion?
I can remember when I first saw King Kong falling off the Empire State Building… I got very emotional about that! And it’s kind of the same at the end of any monster movie when they die. I always get very sad and emotional at the end of almost every monster movie!

Do you have a cult line of dialogue?
I always laugh when Charlton Heston says to the Zombies in The Omega Man : “Are you fellas really with the Internal Revenue Service?” There’s something about that line that always made me laugh!

Which film would you like to live inside?
The movies kind of create a mood… I guess any Mario Bava film. I always liked the spirit, the look of those, so I guess I would like to live in one of his films.

Which film would you show to someone if you were trying to seduce them?
Well, I remember going on at a date in a drive-in, one of the first dates I ever had, and there was a double bill of Clockwork Orange and Deliverance… So I wouldn’t suggest that! It didn’t work very well!

In which other filmmaker’s skin would you like to spend a few hours?
I guess it would be people I never knew or met but whose films I liked, like I would have loved to have known Mario Bava, what he was like, because I like his films very much. So I guess I’ll never have the opportunity to meet somebody like that.

Which actor or actress would you have liked to direct?
In history? I’ve always had a real soft spot for Peter Lorre or Boris Karloff... But I’ve been lucky to be able to have people I admired, like Christopher Lee.

Which book would you like to adapt?
I think books are quite difficult to adapt. It has to be a book that you think is very good. I would be very leery of adapting a book that I liked. But even if I did like it, I wouldn’t want to adapt it.

Which film ending would you most like to change?
Maybe The Sound of Music, I would kill them all off at the end. The whole family!

In your opinion, which event or invention created a before and an after in the history of cinema?
Like sound and colour? Any time a new technology is invented, there’s a before and an after. But I don’t agree with things like saying 3D is a turning-point, because I don’t think it’s the only tool. Even when colour came in, I still like to do black and white. There are so many elements, so many tools, it’s great that they’re all there. It’s like animation: when computer animation came in, they stopped doing drawn animation. And luckily, even after computers, there are still drawers in animation. So it’s best to not think too much about before and afters in my opinion.

In your opinion, just how far can cinema go?
The great think is, it’s all about emotion and story... That was there at the beginning and that will be there at the end, no matter what the technology is. That’s the great thing about it: it’s always got a very simple, kind of human purity to it. That’s a good thing. It can constantly change and everything can happen, and yet the core thing about affecting somebody stays the same, which is beautiful.

Do you have any particular ritual or obsessive behaviour connected with the Cannes Festival?
It’s just like a weird dream. So let’s just the dream happen! I think it’s best not to plan too much. Don’t you think?

What do you most like doing when you are not making films?
I like having time where I’m not doing anything. That’s the time where you actually create the most, when you’re just looking out the window or looking at a tree. It’s at those times in life that you’re just like spacing out, which is rare. So I like to have as much of that time as you can have, because I think that’s the time where you are actually doing the most work, in a strange way.

Is there any question that you would really want to ask and to whom?
I guess the whole British government, like “What’s the hell is going on”? And I think the whole country wants to know what’s going on!

Cannes Jury Pres Burton Demands Release of Iranian Director


The Cannes Film Festival begins today, May 12th, with Tim Burton as the honored Jury President. The jury -- which includes President Tim Burton, Kate Beckinsdale, Emmanuel Carrere, Benicio Del Toro, Giovanna Mezzogiorno, Shekhar Kapur, Victor Erice, Andre Desplat, and Alberto Barbera -- will decide on which film will receive the prestigious Palme d'Or prize. The 51-year-old filmmaker feels a bit intimidated by his role, but is also excited about what the Cannes Film Festival means. Burton's movie Ed Wood was nominated in the competition in 1994, and the director was on the jury a couple of years later. But Burton remains a little anxious being the President of the panel of judges.

"I think we're all very sensitive to being called judges," he says.

"I think that's what the great thing about this group is, we want to view every film with a generosity. Also because we're judges, we'll be judged as judges."

On Tuesday, the jury met to discuss their plans, which include watching all of the films of the festival at least once. "The goal is to not have any preconceptions, I think we've all been judged, so I think we're coming into this with a certain spirit and openness and hopefully compassion for any filmmaker," Burton says.

"We've all been involved in it [film-making] and we all know what that's all about. We all like to be surprised, so there are no preconceptions; we don't want to have a 'certain kind of thing' that we're looking for."

Burton insists he will not make any of his fellow judges get up early to view films during their stay, adding: "The point is to feel the films and discuss how they touch us both intellectually and emotionally."

The line-up of films at Cannes include everything from documentaries and narratives, to big-budget Hollywood movies and independent productions from young, budding filmmakers. The films also come from all over the world, including South Korea, Spain, Italy, the US, Algeria, and China.

"This is what this film festival is all about, people from different countries and different walks of life - that's the exciting part about it," Burton says.

"Hopefully we'll be enjoying the films and enjoying the discussions we have. I think we're all in the spirit of letting the films affect us.

Burton is also excited by the fact that the films are quite different from the fanciful movies he tends to make.

"What I'm excited about is seeing a type of a film that I wouldn't ordinarily make or be involved with, but again, that's the beauty of cinema - to see things that are not in your sphere."

Burton was asked what he felt about there being only a few big Hollywood movies in the schedule this year. He says: "I'm happy about that".

"This is an opportunity for me to see what's going on in cinema and that's what has excited each and every one of us. The element of surprise is something you're always looking for.

"From the beginning of cinema it's always been about what's touched people. Whether it's a big effects movie or a small intimate movie - it's what affects people. I hope and believe that will always be the case.

"This process that we go through is a journey and there are certain things that we have to do. It's very organic in the sense that you see things, you discuss it and it's great if you can try to come up with a consensus.

"At the same time, I think that's the fun and interesting part of this process is to make it like a journey - you know where you have to get to, but you're not quite sure how to get there."

The Palme d'Or will be awarded on May 23rd.



Tim Burton also seized the opportunity to address an important issue. He called for the release of jailed Iranian director Jafar Panahi.

"All of us are for freedom of expression," Burton told a news conference at the film festival. "We fight for that every day and in our lives. So of course one should be free to express oneself."

Earlier, France called on Iran to release the film-maker and allow him to take his seat as a member of the Cannes jury.

"He is one of the most eminent representatives of Iranian film and his place is at the festival where he has been invited as a member of the jury," said Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner and Culture Minister Frederic Mitterrand in a joint statement.

Panahi, age 49, has been held in Tehran's notorious Evin prison since March 1st, when he was arrested by Iranian authorities, reportedly because he was making a film about the disputed 2009 presidential election.

"We call for his immediate release and urge the Tehran authorities to respect the fundamental right of Iranians to freedom of expression and creativity," the French ministers added.

Burton is joined by numerous other prominent filmmakers in demanding the release of Panahi, including Steven Spielberg, Martin Scorsese, Robert De Niro, Robert Redford, Francis Ford Coppola, Joel and Ethan Coen, Ang Lee, Michael Moore and Oliver Stone. They have signed a petition earlier this month demanding his release.

On Tuesday, Amnesty International called on Tehran to allow Panahi to go to Cannes, saying "an empty chair at the Cannes film festival... will highlight the folly and injustice of Iran's crackdown on those who have peacefully criticised the government."

Seaweed Named After Burton


(CBC)

Tim Burton has left his name in film, animation, and modern art. Now, thanks to a Canadian researcher, he can count his name as a (small) contribution to biology.

When Bridgette Clarkson, a University of New Brunswick researcher, identified a "new" species of aquatic plant, she decided to name it after someone who inspired her. She gave the newly-discovered seaweed the official name Euthora timburtoni.

"I decided to name this new species in honour of film director Tim Burton because I grew up watching and loving his films, and I think they had an influence on my imagination," Clarkston said.

"And so when I'm scuba diving in British Columbia and I see this new species and I was collecting it, to me it looked like some kind of strange underwater flower and it always makes me think of Nightmare Before Christmas when I see it, so I thought, why not?"


(Francois Mori/Associated Press)

Monday, May 03, 2010

"Alice" DVD Special Feature Preview

MovieWeb.com has a brief preview of one of the special features for the upcoming DVD and Blu-ray releases of Alice in Wonderland. This video looks at Johnny Depp's transformation into the Mad Hatter:

Wednesday, April 28, 2010

This blog has moved


This blog is now located at http://tbcollectivenews.blogspot.com/.
You will be automatically redirected in 30 seconds, or you may click here.

For feed subscribers, please update your feed subscriptions to
http://tbcollectivenews.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default.

Tuesday, April 27, 2010

Burton Retrospective Leaves MoMA, Heads to Melbourne



Yesterday, the massive retrospective "Tim Burton" ended its five-month run at the Museum of Modern Art in New York City.

During the run of the show, which opened on November 22th, 2009, and closed on Monday, 810,500 visitors came to see an enormous range of artifacts, from movie props and conceptual illustrations to paintings and sculptures from the filmmaker's personal archives to rare films that Burton made as a teenager.

Burton's retrospective was the third most successful of its kind in the history of the MoMA. Pablo Picasso, whose 1980 retrospective at MoMA remains the museum's most popular to this day(with 976,800 visitors), and Henri Matisse, whose 1992 retrospective is still the runner-up (with 940,000).

For those of you who missed it in the United States, the Tim Burton exhibition will be at the Australian Center for the Moving Image in Melbourne from June 24th through October 10th, and at the Bell Lightbox in Toronto from November 26th through April 17th, 2011.


Photo Credit: Marilyn K. Yee/The New York Times.

Friday, April 16, 2010

"Alice in Wonderland" DVD and Blu-ray: June 1st


PRNewsWire.com has the official press release from the Walt Disney Co. concerning the DVD and Blu-ray releases of Alice in Wonderland. The film will be available to purchase on June 1st, 2010, but will not yet be available to view in 3D on your home television sets. But, like Avatar, and with the advancement of 3D televisions, a 3D version will likely be available in the near future.

The suggested retail prices for Alice in Wonderland are as follows: The 3-Disc Blu-ray Combo Pack (Blu-ray + DVD + Digital Copy) is $44.99 (US)/$51.99 (Canada); the 1-Disc Blu-ray is $39.99 (US) /$44.99 (Canada); and the Single Disc DVD is $29.99 (US)/$35.99 (Canada).

Bonus Features:

DVD:

* Finding Alice – It's all things Alice. This featurette includes Tim Burton's vision for the characters, differences from the book and Disney's version of Alice and how she evolves as both a character and actor as she takes an adventure through Wonderland.

* The Mad Hatter – Audiences are provided with a deeper look into the world of the Mad Hatter. Check out Johnny Depp's early sketches, make-up, costumes and how they digitally enhanced his eyes.

* Effecting Wonderland – A behind-the-scenes piece on the different technologies used to create some of the most beloved characters in the film – Stayne, Tweedledee, Tweedledum, Bandersnatch and the Red Queen.


BLU-RAY:

Everything on the DVD plus:


* The Futterwacken Dance – Futterwhat? Check out the making of the timeless dance called the Futterwacken.

* The Red Queen – The creation of the Red Queen from start to finish, including early Tim Burton sketches showcasing costume designs, make-up and digital effects.

* Time-Lapse: Sculpting the Red Queen – A short time-lapse piece showing Helena Bonham Carter as she gets her make-up done. A three-hour process can be watched in just a few short minutes.

* The White Queen – An interview with Anne Hathaway, who plays Wonderland's good queen, about her character's journey throughout the process of the film.

* Scoring Wonderland – Composer Danny Elfman and Tim Burton discuss the music for the movie.

* Stunts of Wonderland – A featurette highlighting some of the biggest stunts in the film.

* Making the Proper Size – An inside look at the visual effects process of growing and shrinking Alice. See how filmmakers used different techniques to stay true to the storyline.

* Cakes of Wonderland – Take a trip to "Cake Divas" where the creators of the EAT ME cakes provide viewers with details about how they made the smallest crumb to the largest cake in scale.

* Tea Party Props – Tea cups, saucers, cakes and more. Prop master Doug Harlocker gives an overview of all the props used to bring the famous tea party scene together visually.

You can pre-order the DVD and Blu-ray at Amazon.com.

The film has been a massive hit for Disney. Approaching the $800-million mark worldwide, Alice in Wonderland has become the studios 4th highest-grossing film of all time.

Wednesday, April 07, 2010

Video: Atwood on "Wonderland" Costumes

Acclaimed costume designer Colleen Atwood talks about the wardrobes of Alice in Wonderland in this video:

Elfman: Interview and Short Film


FirstShowing.net has an interview with Danny Elfman. The composer discusses his creative process, working with Tim Burton, his future projects, his inspirations, and more.

Also, Elfman fans might appreciate this stop-motion animated short film: DemiUrge Emesis by Voltaire, which was narrated by Elfman, and features music by Voltaire and Rasputina (and Burton-alum writer Caroline Thompson gets a "Special Thanks" shout-out, too):




Here's the interview:

I'm very fascinated with the process and the technique of scoring and I wanted to focus on that. Starting at the top, I was wondering if you could walk through a little bit of your scoring process. Do you read the script at the beginning? And what comes next in creating the score?

Danny Elfman: No. I don't actually start with the script. I'm sometimes sent a script. And I actually — believe it or not, I try to avoid getting any ideas or taking any ideas seriously from the script. And what I discovered over the years is that every time I started early and wrote music, none of it ever survived, not a note, when I actually saw the movie. Because what I came to understand is that there's so many ways to shoot the same script. And depending on how the director decides to shoot that script, really, will have a lot to do with what kind of music [I create]. You can take the same script and shoot it very theatrically, with the lighting and the sets, or shoot it very raw or more naturally. And if the cuts are quick and jarring, if the cuts are smooth with lots of dissolves, they just really want a completely different kind of music. Not to mention the huge factor of the performances. And the performances are really– for me, it just so changes what I imagined in my head. I've never seen a movie that ended up like what I thought it was going to be from reading the script.

So it sounds like your process comes from actually watching the finished product, or close to a finished product?

Elfman: Yeah, exactly. It comes from the visuals. Sometimes it's finished, sometimes it's unfinished. On one extreme, you've got a movie like Batman, where [Burton's] only halfway through shooting. He brought me in to sit in with them for a few days on the Gotham City set. And really, between looking at, maybe, 30 minutes of footage that they'd roughed together and walking around the set, I really did, in fact, on the way home from that trip to London, get the whole Batman theme worked out in my head, what became the main title. But that was the type of theme where 30 minutes was certainly enough to get the tone of it. So you have to see something– or rather, I have to see something. I think everybody works completely differently. But for me, as soon as I have a picture, whether it be rough or finished, in front of me, I start hearing the music. It's just an immediate response to image. And so I'm definitely image driven.

Now, it could be a polished, finished film, which happens sometimes when you step in at the very end. Or, more likely, it's just a big rough mess with huge gaps not there. That doesn't matter. You still get the tone and the feel and the performance and the story enough to get started moving. So it all starts with looking at picture, no matter what form that picture is. And then I just start immersing myself in it, really. I get into it a lot, and I try to write down my initial impulses.

I mean, the best way to describe my process is I'll try to pick three or four scenes that I think are crucial turning point scenes to the movie. Maybe, something in the beginning, something in the middle, and certainly there's always some major moments towards the end that define the bigger or more important moments in the film. And I'll put an inordinate number of hours into those scenes. Sometimes, I'll even add the main titles to that. The main titles may not seem important, but they often are to me. Because that's, again, very often how I'll define the tone of what I'm getting into and how it's all going to work.

So if I've written a main title, and I've got three or four or five scenes leading up to a finale. And I feel like I've got those nailed, and I can understand in my head where the themes go and how I need them to behave for me — meaning, do I need them to: If I have a theme I like, do I need it to get whimsical? Do I need it to get heroic? Do I need it to get serious? Do I need it to get mocking? Do I need it to get sarcastic? You know, what do I need it to do? And I need to know that it's going to do all those things I'm going to ask it to. So it's kind of like the theme become an animal, and I've got to make sure it can do all these tricks that I'm going to demand it to do. Before I, then, go about the process of starting the rest of the score.

Do you do a lot of revisions on a particular theme or a piece of music in the film? And how many revisions usually are there? For example, on the theme for Alice in Wonderland, how many different revision did you go through until you got to the final theme we hear in the movie?

Elfman: Well, I mean, there's two levels to that. But in the beginning, when I'm playing music, let's say on Alice for Tim, it's very common that I'll have half a dozen pieces worked out first time I play music for Tim on a particular scene. Because early on, I'll have a lot of ideas. And I'm not sure exactly what my main themes are going to be. I have pieces that I like. So I might try an approach to a scene that I like. And I might try one or two variations to that approach. And then, I might walk away from it, come back– in fact, that's what I try to do. And then approach the scene completely separately again from a totally different perspective. And then, if I can, to even do that a third time.

So whatever I've been working on, whatever I think, "Oh, that's interesting," I'm going to intentionally go back. Leave it for an hour, come back, and then try to write music for the same scene again and do something totally different. That's the kind of variation process when I'm first bringing the director into my world. When we get to the point where, okay, we've got all that stuff nailed down. We've got the big scenes nailed down, and I start scene by scene, there's really no limit to the number of revisions I can do. I mean, there are scenes — there's one scene I know I wrote 23 pieces of music before the final one actually got in there. That's kind of extreme on Alice. Others might've been three or four revisions.

Where does your biggest inspiration come from in composing in general? Is it other musicians or artwork?

Elfman: I don't know. I still think I'm inspired by what I grew up on, in a way. That's a hard one to answer. I grew up as a film music fan, as a young man, way before I started scoring or even was interested in the possibility of scoring. I was a huge fan of Bernard Herrmann and Nino Rota. And I could tell, listening to an old movie, was that a Max Steiner score? Was that a Franz Waxman score? Korngold? Tiomkin? And I loved playing the game of tuning into a movie, an old movie on television, and then trying to guess who the composer was on old stuff, then seeing if I was right. I was definitely a film music nerd, but it never occurred to me to actually do it. So I liken myself to a fan that got pulled into the game, like a basketball player that suddenly gets thrown the ball.

Can you still do the guessing game with today's movies? Can you watch something on TV today or go to another movie now and guess who the composer is from today's movies as well?

Elfman: It's much, much harder today. But there are certain composers that have a real clearly defined style. I might be able to go, "Oh, that's a John Williams score. That's a Tommy Newman score." And there's certainly a lot of composers that surprise me. I go, "Wow. That's really good. I don't know who that is." And then I'll find out. But much more today than back in the old days, you've got a lot of very successful composers who really make their living by imitating other composers.

Of course.

Elfman: In that sense, it's really, really hard. Because I'll go, "Well, am I hearing — is this Jerry Goldsmith? I don't think so. I think it's somebody doing Jerry Goldsmith. But now, they're doing John Williams. And now, at this point in the movie, it seems like they're doing– oh, look at that. They're doing Danny Elfman. Hmm. Interesting." They sound a little bit like a smorgasbord of composers. So in that sense it's harder to tell. Because composers, back in the old days, they didn't freely, in the context of the same move, borrow the style of two to three other contemporaries of theirs and mimic them. But that's a big chunk of film music today.

So then how do you differentiate yourself? How do you continue to stay original and fresh and unique in the scores that you create, so that you can stand out from the others? It seems like that would be a challenge for you, at this point and time, to do that.

Elfman: Well, I mean, it's always a challenge, and I can't say, for a fact, that I do sound original or stand out from the crowd. I mean, that's for others to say. I try to just approach things the best I can. And I hope that what I'm doing is, to some extent, original. You know, nothing's totally original, of course. And believe me, it's also hard not to rip off ourselves. At a certain point, once we have a certain kind of style, there's always a temptation to fall back and do something exactly like we've done before, as well. And that's always a heavy temptation, even if a director doesn't tell us, "I want this style for this scene, and this style for this scene, and this style for this scene." Because I think the biggest difference in composing today and the old days isn't so much the composers — it's the way films are made.

When Alfred Hitchcock made a film with Bernard Herrmann, he wasn't telling Bernard Herrmann, "I really want this cue to sound like this Korngold score. And I really want this one to sound like this Alex North score. But for this cue, can you please give me that thing from, you know, whomever?" He hired Bernard Herrmann to do Bernard Herrmann. And they hired Alex North to do Alex North. The directors didn't get that involved in the music. It was a completely different system. In fact, the director frequently moved onto another film and the editor and the composers were just left to do their work. So it was just night and day completely different. And I'm not saying that that's better. It's just very different.

Now, you have directors who frequently will insist on different scenes in their moving sounding like something that they've already got in their head, or something from another movie. So I'm not really– I'm not trying to blast other composers for being derivative more than they should be or need be. It's really about the filmmaking process. Because I've been there, and every composer goes through this problem of a director's got something in their head. And it's just really hard to shake them out of it. It's the fact that directors are who they are, and their own personalities cause that. Composers, like everybody else, we have to– at a certain point you have to give them what they want. Or you have to, at a certain point, turn your back and split. It's a very difficult process.

So in terms of where it is and where it was and where it's going, it's really hard to say. But in the process of knowing that directors can be very, very picky and very difficult, I try, as all composers that are worth anything– and there's a lot of really good composers out there today. You try to keep your own voice. You try to sell it to the director from the perspective that you think makes the most sense. And sometimes you have to pick your battles. Sometimes it gets really bloody in the process. And sometimes it's not. Sometimes it's really easy.

So you never know what to expect. Every movie is like walking out onto this landscape. This is the best way I can describe it. Each film you start, as a composer, you're walking out onto this huge landscape. And you can talk about music until your blue in the face with a director. It doesn't mean shit. Because when you start actually playing stuff for them, it's never going to be what they're expecting. Because there actually is no way to describe music. And you can't show a picture of it. You're going to talk about it in an abstract level. At a certain point they'll hear it. And they're going to respond the way they're going to respond. And often, they don't even know why they're responding the way they respond. It's just how they're emotionally responding to the music. And that landscape, sometimes, is like this lovely bucolic stroll, where it's like being on a boat and gliding down a river. And sometimes that landscape, you find yourself in the middle of World War I. The army's tanks are coming from every which direction and gas grenades are getting thrown. And there's shells coming from everywhere. And you really put out your energy and try to keep your head down and not get hit.

So the crazy thing about it is that you often just never know what– you open a door, and you start into this landscape. And you take a few steps, and you really have no idea what that landscape's going to become. So that's really the best metaphor I can describe for what it's like starting a new film. Sometimes, you finish a film, and you go, "Man, I was expecting that was going to be so difficult. And it was just so smooth, such a lovely experience. And it was such a nice, straight, easy path." And then, sometimes, you know, you get to the other side really feeling like you just survived a war. And that can feel good, too, by the way.

Yeah. With Alice, you've, obviously, worked with Tim Burton I think more than any other director. And that must–

Elfman: Well, yeah. Yeah, 13th time, and I have to say I can't predict him any more now than on Pee-wee's Big Adventure.

So he's just as unpredictable?

Elfman: Yea, completely unpredictable. People think we have some kind of shorthand, that I know what he's going to be looking for. And he knows what to expect. He really isn't that way, at all. I appreciate and understand his sensibility. But how he's going to react to a particular piece of music, I have no way of predicting.

Does he want something new from you in every film he does? Or does he even reference his own films and say, "Oh, I want the sound from this one, or I want the sound from this other one?"

Elfman: No. He'll never say from anything. He'll really just say, "This music makes me feel this way." And I don't know why, but it does. And then, I have to sit there and go, "Okay. What is it? Is the orchestration? Is it the melody?" And so I'll, then, do a lot of trial and error. I'll take the same piece– sometimes, I'll write something completely different. Sometimes I'll take the same piece and just change a few things. Change the tempo and change the orchestration. And suddenly, he really likes it.

So there's a very tricky intuitive process of what's making the director feel this way. Is it this instrument? Is it the sound of the trumpet? Is it the sound of the clarinet? Or, really, is it just the melody? Or is it just this turn in a melody? And if I take this turn and change it, suddenly, it's feeling completely different. And so very often, there's a lot of experimentation, changing it, rearranging it, re-orchestrating it. And if it's still not working, at a certain point, you have to abandon it completely, and just go somewhere else. But sometimes, it's also surprising what an impact a small adjustment can make to a piece of music and in the actual orchestration of it.

What are you working on at the moment. Do you have anything else coming up? I think you're on The Green Hornet, right?

Elfman: Not quite yet. I'm doing Restless, for Gus Van Sant. And then, we move on to The Green Hornet with Michel Gondry.

How are those two going? I mean, I look forward to hearing all of your scores, but it's always exciting to know so early out how they're coming along.

Elfman: I don't know. I've really just written a little bit of music for Gus. I haven't presented him anything, yet. I know Gus well enough to know that we'll take a journey together. And I'll try lots of different things. Gus will encourage me to try lots of really radically different things. You know, approach it from completely different angles. And it'll be interesting. I've never worked with Michel, and I'm really looking forward to it. I'm a big fan of his. So I have no idea to expect from that.

I think that's a perfect place to wrap up.

Elfman: Well, great.

Thank you very much for your time. I really appreciate it.

Elfman: My pleasure, totally. I'll talk to you again some day.